Bugs, drugs and guts | Pratik Shah | TEDxBeaconStreet


Translator: Ilze Garda
Reviewer: Denise RQ I’m going to talk
about something we cannot see, and we’re going to visualize it
today together. So let me start
with a very simple question about who we are. As a microbiologist
and as a geneticist, as a biologist, when I look at all of you right now, I see one human,
with 30 trillion bacteria inside you. That’s right, at this very moment, all of us are carrying
30 trillion bacteria. They are invisible, they are amazing,
they do stupendous things for us. They help us digest our food, they help us act as sentinels
of our immune system, but we never see them. Ladies and gentlemen,
meet your microbio. What we know about bacteria
and infectious diseases is the dark side of this interaction
we have with them, which is commonly known as disease, and we all are familiar with
epidemics of plague, cholera, and right now
the ongoing pandemic of Ebola that’s going on in Africa,
and in our country a little bit, too. So how do these relationship shift from being 30 trillion harmless [bacteria]
to making us sick? And what can we do? Throughout [history] we have been combating
bugs in different ways, and in the 20th century we discovered
something called antibiotics. Antibiotics are
these small molecules of drugs that you take, you eat, or you inject
to kill the bacteria in your body. Unfortunately, they end up
killing both the good and the bad, and that’s a problem. While we were innovating,
bacteria were innovating too. They were like, “Oh, OK…”
(Laughter) So what they did is they became resistant to almost all the antibiotics
that we have. I had a shoulder surgery five years back, and when I talked to my physician
after coming out of surgery, the list of antibiotics I was put on
was crazy; I was like, “Wow!” Then he, or she, at that point,
they both told me that this is the current state
where many bugs that we have now are not treated
with these antibiotics that we have. And the numbers are staggering: every year, 6.9 million kids die
before they reach their fifth birthday. Out of these children,
approximately 2 million kids die due to pneumonia and diarrhea,
and these are infectious diseases. If you see, there is
no Ebola on this slide. We need to start a conversation
about managing infectious diseases better in our world that we live in. President Barack Obama in September
of this year issued an executive order, and the order states that scientists,
innovators, community members like you, all of us should come together
and brainstorm for a better way
to manage infectious diseases because our current arsenal of drugs which can treat [infections]
has been depleted. To solve these things, there are
a couple of things we need to know. The first thing we need to know is that we will have access
to a patient whom we will call John. John consistently falls ill
because he drinks contaminated water, and gets diarrhea. And before we leave this room,
we’re going to make sure John gets better. That’s the task for today. Diarrhea is a serious disease. It kills approximately
2,000 kids every day. Let’s simulate a quick diarrheal infection
in this room, quickly. If you were in John’s body right now, and these were the walls
of John’s intestines, and all of you were bacteria, there were two things you did
when you entered John’s body. The first thing you did
is you grabbed a seat; that’s what you did when you entered
this room. (Laughter) The second thing you did as soon as
you entered is you looked for food. And that’s exactly
what infectious agents do: they get into our body, they find a place
to park themselves, and they start eating. These are usually called
dietary requirements of infectious agents. As a microbiologist, I am passionate
to not kill bacteria first, before we understand what they do to us. Till now, we have been killing them
without understanding what they do, so let’s change
the approach a little bit here. So this is John, drinking
contaminated water, and this is you in John’s guts, coming in (Laughter) you grab a seat, and John’s body provides you
with this amazing food that you love. The bugs eat these food molecules
that John’s body naturally provides them, and they become virulent, pathogenic,
and they [cause] John diarrhea, obviously. I decided to intersect
into this problem in a different way, I wanted to understand what other food sources
our body provides to bacteria when they cause infection. The technology I used to understand that
is called metabolomics. What metabolomics does is [that it] basically allows you to take any biological sample, infected sample,
from a patient, from an animal, and lets you understand, get a peek
or eavesdrop into the conversation that’s happening
between a patient and a bacterium, and understand what are the food sources that the body is producing
when we are sick. These food sources
are usually called metabolites. These are the food sources
that the bugs get when we get infected. With this information,
I was able to build a Google map of all the metabolites you get
when you are sick, – in the context of diarrhea and a couple
of other infectious diseases – and these are the metabolites
your body produces once you get sick. Apparently, humans
had been dealing with bacteria before we invented antibiotics, right? Antibiotics in the 20th century. It turns out when you’re sick, your body produces
two different kinds of metabolites. The first metabolite your body produces are these blue ones
which are called pathogenic metabolites. These pathogenic metabolites,
when the bugs eat them, produce millions of molecules of toxins, and these are the toxin molecules
that the bugs produce, and you get sick. On the other hand, your body
also produces millions of molecules – small amounts or trace amounts,
depending on the infection – and these are the green metabolites
– just colored here for understanding – that the bugs have evolved not to eat, they’ve learned to ignore
and not eat them, or learned to circumvent themselves
from these metabolites. So I did an experiment in the lab: what if we make these bugs eat these non-pathogenic
or these other metabolites which they usually don’t eat? The answer was:
when they eat those metabolites, they basically become
avirulent or nonpathogenic. In other words, they turn
their toxin production down. More toxin, disease;
less toxin, less disease. So what we have is that nature has programmed us
and bugs to have this conversation, and the conversation basically is: what do bacteria eat
when they cause disease? Usually they eat the foods which make them pathogenic
and make toxins. Sometimes, we can change
these interactions by making the bugs eat things
which sometimes make them nonpathogenic. So this is the handle we have on John.
Now let’s try and cure John, OK? So, John has diarrhea, and we’re going to see
what we can do to help John. This is the second experiment
I did in the lab. I reasoned if all of you
are bacteria in John’s body, you come inside this room,
you are expecting pathogenic metabolites, and this is what you’ve been eating,
let’s assume that’s called steak. What if, when you walked into John’s body, we make John give you the other green,
nonpathogenic metabolites? Let’s call them salad. So I said: “OK, let’s see
what happens to John.” These are not steaks and salads,
this is for the purpose of the talk, these are organic molecules. (Laughter) You guys are smarter than me,
so I’m assuming you got that. So you did that, and basically
what happens is – I was surprised – I failed miserably. The bugs wouldn’t eat them,
they would not like them. It’s like training a pet:
they’re like, “No… No…” (Laughter) So finally, after a lot of screening,
a lot of screening, I identified a few metabolites
which I thought would work. If those would work,
then let’s see what happens to John. Does he get better?
Does he get ill? What happens? Here’s John, again drinking
contaminated water, this is you guys eating steak, and we flush it, and we give them
these new metabolites. The bugs don’t know, they’re eating them, they don’t like them, in the real sense
they become nonpathogenic, they turn the toxin production down, and they start exiting John’s body
in noninfectious state, and John is happy. There are a couple of things
I hope you took from it. A: we did not kill them.
We did not kill them. Up till now, we have been killing them, and this is a concept
that we need to think about, that infectious agents usually
can be trained, can be modulated, their diets can be changed. What I’m thinking,
and what we all should think, is there a way we can intersect
into this problem of infectious diseases by providing bugs, or training them
for the new generation of food sources? These food sources will make
the bugs avirulent or nonpathogenic versus killing them, and after they’ve become
avirulent or nonpathogenic, they are trained to exit our bodies in a way that is safe
for us to pass them out. Let’s assume that in the future
we design a system which I’m calling at this point
‘on demand food service for bugs’. (Laughter) The science behind this
is really interesting. The science is that basically,
when you’ve got an infectious disease instead of coming back
with an antibiotic and killing the bugs, the first or the front-line therapy
in the future should be and could be
understanding and managing the infection by training the bugs,
by giving them food sources which, instead of making them pathogenic, first make them
nonpathogenic, noninfectious, and then, if required,
come back with antibiotics. This concept allows us to use
the antibiotics in a more rational way. It buys us time, basically to look for better antibiotics
which we are not able to find, and this allows us not to go back
and start killing them all over again, because we did that 50 years ago,
and right now they are resistant. As the drawing board has been wiped
clean all over the world with scientists, and business and industry people
looking for more drugs, this is a new approach
where basically we have an opportunity to fix this problem the right way
for once and hopefully for a long time. Because once we’d discovered penicillin,
we stopped looking. And the bugs discovered
penicillin too, after 50 years, and they were like,
“Hang on… I got a problem.” Then a couple of take-home messages
I want you to think about: First one, that dietary needs
of an infectious agent can be used to design
novel antimicrobials. Second, a large scale deployment
of these things is possible. We humans already have a network in place. Do you eat fortified wheat at home? Yes. Do you eat salt with iodine in it? Yes. So we already have
a huge network of fortified foods rolling out in our communities, but up till now, these fortified foods
only helped our health. You drink vitamin water,
you get vitamins in your body, but the bugs have largely been ignored. The other thing I’m working on is the next generation
of oral rehydration salt solution. This is given to patients
who have diarrhea like John. But all that oral
rehydration salt solution does is replenish the salts
and the metabolites in your body that you loose while you have diarrhea, it does nothing to the bugs. The bugs are just using
John’s body as a vehicle. The next generation
of oral rehydration salt solutions will hopefully include
these nonpathogenic metabolites that can be incorporated
as a front-line therapy before you get antibiotics. I want all of you to think
about these things and discuss them, and see if there are novel ways we can intersect into this problem
of antibiotic resistance because if not now,
in the next 50 years, you’re going to face it. Thank you. (Applause)

9 Replies to “Bugs, drugs and guts | Pratik Shah | TEDxBeaconStreet”

  1. I like your approach to deal with the problem. But I have a very basic query… When we supply the food..non pathogenic… bugs will not eat and leave the place and will not produce toxins…thats fine.. but then where those bugs goes.. they were still hungry. How to fulfill their food requirement? They may die due to hunger…(Ref: Animation shown in the video). So we want to retain good bugs. What is the solution with you for this. 

  2. Thats an interesting approach. But at the end of the video, you mentioned if we provide non-pathogenic substances to bacteria, they will leave our body. Instead why don't we provide some substance so that they can stay but not create any toxins and do the good work like digestion. Just a thought !

  3. Pratik Shah deserves the noble prize if he can take this discovery and make more progress and create / design a working approach anti microbial.

  4. Since when is diarrhea an infectious disease? How can I give diarrhea to another person? This is a really smart person saying some really stupid stuff.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *